Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from November, 2020

Politics: Attention Spans, Politics and Populism – Why Does It Work?

Shakespeare’s first performed plays occurred in the late 16th century, the colour television was first demonstrated in 1928, the first YouTube video (‘Me at the zoo’, uploaded by co-founder Jawed Karim) was released approximately 23 years ago, and the modern social media titan, TikTok, was created approximately 10 years ago.  The final marked an important, dangerous and disquieting epoch in entertainment. Though the claim that human attention span has dropped under that of a goldfish remains an incontrovertibly proven fallacy, in the past 20 years alone, the average amount of time a person can spend focused on a task digitally has plummeted from two and a half minutes to just 47 seconds. 47 seconds before we check the time, fiddle with our phones and lose our train of thought. Addiction to short-form content as such has greatly contributed to this collapse.  To put it plainly, attention is a digital drug. It harnesses mass amounts of political, economic and social sway. For...

Clair de Lune: The history of the world’s most overplayed piano piece

CHAMOD SAMARASINGHE Classical music is an unusual art. It is dominated by a few pieces which are far more popular than everything else which has been composed within the past few centuries. When compared to Beethoven’s fifth symphony, Bach’s toccata in d minor, Handel’s messiah and fur Elise (and a few others), everything else is a comparative blur to most. Scholars could argue that this is due to their memorable nature and overall simplicity (for the listener, not the composer), but there is one notable exception to this rule: Clair de Lune by Claude Debussy. While the opening melody is certainly ear-catching and repetitive, everything else seems deliberately ambiguous, perfectly melancholy, and at times downright unusual. 

The Principle of Morality According to Kant

NOAH BUCKLE Note: As the present article relies heavily on the argumentation of Kant (comprising, more or less, a presentation or interpretation of the basics of his moral philosophy), I have not indicated in every case where Kant is quoted directly, choosing instead to supplement each discussion with a citation of the relevant passage(s). I see a great deal of value in his ethics, so much so that I feel it necessary only to reiterate the words of Jean Paul Richter: “For heaven’s sake, buy two books: Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals and [his] Critique of Practical Reason !”