Skip to main content

Posts

A New Leaf for the Looking Glass 2026/27

Dear all, Upon inheriting the Looking Glass from our predecessors, we identified a number of key issues. Firstly, there were simply not enough articles being published, due both to a lack of submissions from the school community and limited responsiveness from the previous Academic Team. Secondly, the Looking Glass had not been advertised or explained effectively enough to the wider school community. As a result, we plan to implement a more consistent and engaging stream of articles on the Looking Glass. As part of this initiative, we are looking to recruit a select group of keen writers from across the lower school who would be willing to produce one high-quality piece of writing, discussion, or media each month for publication on the Looking Glass. We believe this will be hugely beneficial both to the school community, which will gain access to a wider range of opinions and viewpoints, and to prospective writers, who will be able to reference their experience contributing to the Look...
Recent posts

English: Postcolonialism in ‘Things Fall Apart’

Note: The following article was written by Malek Owera L6 ( 20oweram@students.watfordboys.org) The colonial literature of the late 19th and early 20th centuries had a profound impact on Chinua Achebe’s future literary output. At his secondary school, Government College Umuahia, also known as the “Eton of the East”, he encountered the works of Rudyard Kipling (a “champion” of the British Empire) and Joseph Conrad (author of ‘Heart of Darkness’), among others. Decades later, he would write that during his education, he “did not see [himself] as an African”.  He also added that when reading stories such as Conrad’s ‘Heart of Darkness’, a novella with various critical responses regarding colonialist and racist attitudes, he “took sides with the white men against the savages”. Achebe’s 1958 novel ‘Things Fall Apart’ is considered one of the first * novels to be written from the perspective of colonised, rather than the coloniser. By writing ‘Things Fall Apart’, Achebe intended to disma...

Economics: An econometric analysis of the effects of Austrian marriage subsidies

  Note: The following article was written by Lucky Bheemreddy L6 (20bheemreddyl@students.watfordboys.org) 1- Introduction This academic year I undertook a research project examining whether Austrian marriage subsidies (grants given to those that get married) stimulated greater investment levels in the economy. Having completed and published a literature review, I extended this project and independently implemented econometric analysis to empirically assess whether Austria's 1986 marriage subsidy reform generated a measurable effect on national investment behaviour, rather than simply altering the timing and incidence of marriage. The policy is designed under the assumption that marriage promotes greater financial stability, higher household saving, and ultimately stronger investment outcomes at the macroeconomic level. This implies a causal chain running from marital status to household financial integration, and from household behaviour to aggregate capital formation. However, as ...

Economics: The Free Trade-Off

Note: The following article was written by Shane Nagpal L6B (20NagpalS@students.watfordboys.org) Global trade is not a small side issue. UNCTAD estimated that global trade in goods and services surpassed $35 trillion in 2025, reaching a new record. This makes the question of free trade feel urgent rather than theoretical. A cheap T-shirt, a smartphone assembled across five countries, fruit in winter, coffee before school. The cotton from the T-shirts may be grown in one country, stitched in another, shipped through a third and sold on a British high street by the weekend. Free trade is everywhere. It sits quietly behind the lower prices consumers enjoy and the larger markets firms depend on.  But the same T-shirt can also tell a darker story: a closed factory in Talbot, a steelworker in Ohio, or a farming community hit by retaliatory tariffs. Free trade creates winners and losers. The question is not whether the winners exist. The real question is whether the winners gain enough, a...

Law: Uber BV vs Aslam (landmark case analysis)

Note: The following article was written by Arjun Santilale L6 ( 20santilalea@students.watfordboys.org) Uber BV vs Aslam serves as a landmark case for employment law in a modern economy. Decided by the UK Supreme Court in 2021, it was established that people who drove for Uber were labelled workers rather than self-contractors. This was important because workers have certain legal rights, which self-contractors don’t. Ultimately, this case serves its importance through understanding that, despite contractual labels, priority is placed on the real working relationship between a company and individuals. To understand the case, it is important to consider how Uber works. Uber provides a smartphone app that connects passengers with drivers who are willing to give them rides. Drivers use their own vehicles and can choose when to log into the app and accept trips. Because drivers appear to have choices over their working hours, Uber argued that it was only a technology platform that allowed i...

Economics: Will Artificial Intelligence trigger the next productivity revolution in developed economies?

Note: The following article was written by Siddharth Sethi L6 (20SethiS@students.watfordboys.org) Growth led by productivity has long been seen as the driving force to increase living standards. Paul Krugman claimed that ‘productivity isn’t everything, but in the long run it is almost everything’. Since the early 21st century, many developed economies have experienced weak productivity, especially the UK, giving rise to concerns about stagnating wages and improvements to living standards.  Figure 1. GDP per hour worked in US$ within selected developed economies, 1990-2023. Source: The Productivity Institute. Although AI has significant potential to trigger a new productivity revolution, historical experience suggests that technological breakthroughs alone are insufficient. Gains will ultimately depend on complementary investments in human capital and infrastructure, and if institutions ensure that the benefits are shared rather than concentrated in the wealthy.  One of the str...

Economics: Is a country truly wealthy if it has high GDP, but its citizens are unhappy?

Note: The following article was written by Zain Khwaja L6B (20khwajaz@students.watfordboys.org) Online figures have claimed there are seven types of wealth: spiritual, mental, physical, social, influential, community, and generational. I believe this framework is much too complicated. When looking at countries, both historically and in the present, wealth can be understood through three broader dimensions: material resources, human wellbeing, and social power. In a perfectly theoretical society, it would be almost impossible to have one of these without the other two. For example, a country with a high GDP will likely have greater material resources, which citizens can use to improve their wellbeing through things such as healthcare, education, leisure, or even gym memberships. Material wealth can also provide access to corridors of social power. Yet there are two key hindrances to the idea that high GDP automatically enables wealth in all aspects of life, and therefore complete happin...

Politics: Do voters primarily act rationally, or are they guided more by identity and emotion?

Note: The following article was written by Zain Khwaja L6B (20khwajaz@students.watfordboys.org) If voters were rational, turnout would be closer to 0. This reflects the view of Anthony Downs, an American economist, who argued that rational individuals vote only when the expected personal benefit outweighs the costs of participation, and when their individual ballot could realistically alter the outcome. Downs proposed the “calculus of voting” in 1957, a formula intended to quantify a personal assessment of the utility of voting: R = (P × B) – C Here, R is the reward from voting, P is the probability of being decisive, B is the benefit if one’s preferred candidate wins, and C is the cost of participation. Therefore, in elections with large turnouts, it is almost always irrational to vote from Downs’s point of view. This is because the probability of one’s vote being decisive is basically close to zero. If P ≈ 0 , the formula reduces to –C , meaning voting only really produces a cost...